On 1 July 2023, the Government introduced a requirement whereby residential aged care providers must ensure that “at least one registered nurse is on site, and on duty, at all times at the residential facility” (24/7 RN requirement). Providers are also required to report monthly on their compliance with this requirement. The first report is due by 11.59pm AEST Monday 7 August 2023. Here’s what you need to know.
You must submit your report by 11.59pm AEST Monday 7 August. This is the first in an ongoing, monthly requirement to report.
Your report must cover each day of the month that your facility was used for the purpose of delivering residential care (i.e. if your facility was closed for three days in July, then you don’t have to report on what happened on those three days). For most providers, the “reporting period” will be the entire month.
Your report must answer these questions:
*The reporting system will only let you select one “reason” and one “alternative arrangement”. If there is more than one reason or alternative arrangement, select the main reason/alternative arrangement.
If you are exempt from the requirement, you must still report. You will not be required to report the matters listed in the dot points above, as these won’t be relevant to you, but you must report the fact that you are exempt.
Report online via the Government Provider Management System (GPMS).
“On site” means that an RN must be within the confines of the residential facility or the immediate surrounds.
“On duty” means the RN must be available to provide care to consumers and oversight of the care provided by other care staff as needed.
Yes. An RN is considered to be on duty when taking breaks if:
If an RN goes off site during a break, they are not “on site and on duty”.
Yes. If you are exempt from the 24/7 RN requirement, you must still log into GPMS and report the fact that you were exempt for the reporting period.
No. The requirement is for an RN to be on site and on duty 24/7.
It depends. For the purposes of the 24/7 requirement, the RN’s hours only count if the RN’s prime purpose for that shift was to provide care to consumers and oversight of care provided by other staff. E.g. if an RN worked a shift primarily to do administrative duties rather than care or oversight of care, they were not “on site and on duty” as an RN.
According to the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (Commission), these are some of the “alternative clinical care arrangements” that a provider can put in place to ensure that consumers are properly cared for in the absence of a 24/7 RN:
The Commission wants to see detailed evidence of these arrangements documented in the provider’s clinical governance framework and relevant policies and procedures:
“The evidence must detail associated policies, procedures and supporting documentation, including clear protocols for how staff are made aware of and will reliably activate the arrangements as required. Providers should be able to evidence at any time how they ensure that the clinical care needs of consumers at their facility are met when an RN is not on site or when there is a lack of clinically trained staff available.”
The Commission monitors compliance with the 24/7 RN requirement. In its regulatory bulletin, the Commission said that it “recognises that the aged care sector is affected by external pressures which may present challenges to approved providers in attracting and retaining a suitably skilled and competent workforce.” The Commission added that:
“In short, a provider that is non-compliant with a specific responsibility but can evidence its ongoing efforts to comply, its provision of safe and quality care to consumers at all times, and its effective management of risks to consumers, is unlikely to be subject to escalated enforcement action by the Commission in the absence of other concerns about compliance or performance.”
The Commission understands that there will be occasional “gaps” where a home cannot have an RN on site and on duty. Their main concern is not whether or not a home has met the requirement to the letter of the law, but rather the evidence of “risk to consumers”. The Commission wants to see that homes have made “alternative clinical care arrangements” to ensure that, where there is an occasional gap in 24/7 RN care, consumers will not be put at risk.
Where there are serious risks to consumers, the Commission will: