The capabilities and performance of the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission (Commission) have been reviewed by an independent assessor and the results have been published in the Final Report – Independent Capability Review of the Aged Care Quality and Safety Commission.
Overall, the report found that the Commission is taking some important first steps but must undergo radical change to become a useful and effective force in the industry. Here is a short summary of the report.
Assess the Commission’s performance by examining its “strengths, opportunities and weaknesses, and the extent to which these inhibit or enable a high-performing, contemporary, best practice regulator”.
Focus on the future – “What the Commission needs to do to ensure that it can successfully undertake its important role of ensuring the safety and wellbeing of older Australians in the context of the new Aged Care Act.”
“The Commission is taking important steps to ensure that it evolves into a high performing regulator. There is much to build from, and I commend the work of the Commissioner, her team and staff across the organisation for these steps. However, it is clear that there is much more to be done.”
The report identified several areas where the Commission needed to improve, in many cases as a “matter of urgency”. You can read each of the 32 specific recommendations at pages 10-13 of the report, but for now here is a summary of the key areas.
The Commission needs to fix its organisational structure, senior leadership, and internal governance. This includes:
The Commission must fix significant problems in its complaints process and Serious Incident Response Scheme (SIRS). This includes:
The Commission must “improve transparency and accountability by sharing information, engaging more openly and working with providers”. Specifically:
The report recommended that “a resourcing model be developed that includes for some functions a funding mechanism that sees its appropriation revenue directly determined by estimated workloads, which can be adjusted throughout each year based on actual workload – a demand-driven mechanism”.
Aged care is a challenging industry that requires continuous improvement to ensure quality care. Providers must constantly work to be better because none of them are perfect. But neither is the Commission. One of the things that the report shows is that at least some of the frustration that providers have felt with regard to the Commission’s actions (or inactions) is justified. From this, providers can take some solace and some optimism.
The Commission has now been officially advised to improve its information-sharing and collaboration with aged care providers. Providers should familiarise themselves with these recommendations in particular and do their part to help the Commission to achieve this goal.