Recent changes to the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) now impose a ‘positive duty’ on employers to take reasonable and proportionate measures to eliminate, so far as possible, sexual harassment and other related unlawful conduct in the workplace. Employers are required to take proactive steps to prevent the conduct, rather than taking reactive steps after it has already occurred. Here’s what you need to know.
The ‘positive duty’ requires an employer or person conducting a business or undertaking to take ‘reasonable and proportionate’ measures to eliminate, as far as possible, these acts of unlawful conduct:
Work Health and Safety laws have required employers to provide a safe workplace for many years, which means identifying reasonably foreseeable hazards, assessing their risk of harm, and implementing control measures to eliminate or minimise the risk of harm from those hazards. The changes to the Sex Discrimination Act apply the same approach to preventing harassment. Employers are now expected to:
This goes much further than the earlier expectations under the Sex Discrimination Act where preventative measures were usually limited to ensuring that relevant policies were in place and understood by employees, and procedures were in place to deal with allegations. The new positive duty now requires employers to be much more proactive. Employers must now identify circumstances which present a risk of unlawful conduct occurring and then implement “reasonable and proportionate” control measures tailored to their organisation.
What it means to take “reasonable and proportionate” steps will look different for each organisation, although there are some overarching requirements. The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) has recently released Guidelines and a Quick Guide which set out the Guiding Principles and the seven Standards that the AHRC expects employers to meet to satisfy the positive duty. The Guiding Principles and the Standards are intended to help organisations determine practical actions that they can implement to comply with their positive duty, as well as being the standards against which the AHRC will assess compliance. We have summarised the key elements below.
Employers must identify circumstances where there is a risk of harassment or inappropriate conduct occurring in their organisation, and this should be done in consultation with employees. Consultation is particularly important as it is an opportunity for issues to be raised and for participants to identify situations where unlawful conduct may occur, keeping in mind that different employees may have different perspectives.
It is also important to remember that sexual harassment is determined by what a reasonable person would anticipate that a particular individual may feel is offensive, humiliating, or intimidating conduct. The AHRC Guiding Principles require that solutions be “person-centred and trauma-informed”. An organisation must also identify circumstances specific to aged care/ home care and unique to their organisation.
Employers should:
The organisation:
The AHRC Guidelines stress the role of an organisation’s senior team in preventing harassment by leading appropriate behaviours and establishing a respectful culture.
Leadership team:
The AHRC will be investigating and reviewing compliance with the new duties. Organisations are expected to keep records of all related compliance activities, such as which risks were identified and how they were identified, the measures taken to control them, consultation undertaken, training, and responses to incidents.
From 12 December 2023 the AHRC will have new powers to investigate and enforce an employer's positive duty to eliminate unlawful conduct in the workplace. These powers include the ability to conduct inquiries, issue compliance notices, seek court-ordered compliance, and enter into enforceable undertakings with organisations.
Consequences are not limited to breaches of the Sex Discrimination Act: if an employer fails to protect their employees from harassment or victimisation resulting in harm, this will also constitute a breach of their responsibilities under Work Health and Safety laws unless they can demonstrate that they took “reasonable and proportionate” steps to prevent the conduct from occurring.